首页> 外文OA文献 >Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
【2h】

Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions

机译:改善急诊护理中患者安全的治理:对干预措施进行系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility.DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature.METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsychInfo were searched for studies published between January 1990 and July 2014. We included studies evaluating interventions relevant for higher management to oversee and manage patient safety, in prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) organisations and hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). Two reviewers independently selected candidate studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies were categorised according to study quality, setting, sample, intervention characteristics and findings.RESULTS: Of the 18 included studies, 13 (72%) were non-experimental. Nine studies (50%) reported data on the reliability and/or validity of the intervention. Eight studies (44%) reported on the feasibility of the intervention. Only 4 studies (22%) reported statistically significant effects. The use of a simulation-based training programme and well-designed incident reporting systems led to a statistically significant improvement of safety knowledge and attitudes by ED staff and an increase of incident reports within EDs, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of the interventions included in this review (eg, anonymous incident reporting and validation of incident reports by an independent party) could provide useful input for the design of an effective tool to govern patient safety in EMS organisations and EDs. However, executives cannot rely on a robust set of evidence-based and feasible tools to govern patient safety within their emergency care organisation and in the chain of emergency care. Established strategies from other high-risk sectors need to be evaluated in emergency care settings, using an experimental design with valid outcome measures to strengthen the evidence base.
机译:目的:系统地审查旨在改善急诊护理中患者安全性,有效性,可靠性,有效性和可行性的干预措施设计:文献的系统综述方法:PubMed,EMBASE,护理累积索引和专职健康文献,Cochrane系统评价数据库和PsychInfo进行了检索,以寻找1990年1月至2014年7月之间发表的研究。我们纳入了评估与院前急诊医疗服务(EMS)组织和医院相关的与更高管理相关的干预措施以监督和管理患者安全的研究。急诊科。两名审稿人独立选择了候选研究,提取了数据并评估了研究质量。研究根据研究质量,设置,样本,干预特征和发现进行分类。结果:在18项纳入研究中,有13项(占72%)为非实验性研究。九项研究(50%)报告了干预措施的可靠性和/或有效性的数据。八项研究(44%)报告了干预的可行性。只有4项研究(22%)报告了统计学上的显着效果。通过使用基于模拟的培训计划和精心设计的事件报告系统,ED员工在安全方面的知识和态度在统计学上得到了显着改善,并且ED内事件报告的增加。结论:本干预措施的特点审查(例如匿名事件报告和独立方对事件报告的确认)可以为设计有效的工具来管理EMS组织和ED中的患者安全提供有用的信息。但是,高管们不能依靠一套强大的基于证据的可行工具来管理其急救组织内和急救链中的患者安全。需要在紧急护理环境中评估来自其他高风险部门的既定策略,使用具有有效结果指标的实验设计来加强证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号